Achinstein proposes answers in terms of the concepts of evidence introduced. As the premier book in the fabulous new series oxford studies in philosophy of science, this volume is essential for philosophers of science and historians of science, as well as for statisticians, scientists with philosophical interests, and anyone curious about. Achinstein is famous for his work on evidence, explanation, and real ismthe three topics with which the essays in this collection dealbut he is equally famous for his work on the history of. The concept of evidence oxford readings in philosophy.
In works such as particles and waves which won the lakatos award in 1993, the book of evidence, scientific evidence, and evidence and method, achinstein developed a standard for scientific evidence that requires the high probability of an explanatory connection between evidence and hypothesis. Consequently, they are unable to help us understand. Evidence and method peter achinstein oxford university. Let us return to the hypothesis that generated the paradox. Stanford libraries official online search tool for books, media, journals, databases, government documents and more. The book of evidence by peter achinstein, 9780195171716, available at book depository with free delivery worldwide. Therefore it need a free signup process to obtain the book. Scientific strategies of isaac newton and james clerk maxwell the renowned philosopher of science peter achinstein focuses on the question whether.
In this book achinstein introduces four concepts of evidence, which he calls potential, veridical, epistemic. He is the jay and jeanie schottenstein university professor of philosophy at yeshiva university, director of the yeshiva center for history and philosophy of science, and a professor at johns hopkins university. Evidence and method peter achinstein oxford university press. In broad outline, this view claims a that confirmation is a relation of positive relevance, viz. What is required for a fact to be evidence for a hypothesis. Peter achinstein books list of books by author peter achinstein. Evidence and method scientific strategies of isaac newton and james clerk maxwell peter achinstein. In this book achinstein introduces four concepts of evidence, which he calls potential, veridical. The problem is that these theories are prescriptive, formal, and a priori. His main focus is truthrelevant speculations, in which speculators believe that the assumptions or hypotheses used are approximately true or. Scientific strategies of isaac newton and james clerk maxwell.
He claims these theories are much too weak to give scientists what they wanta good reason to believeand, in some cases, they furnish. In his earlier book, achinstein answers by articulating a definition of scientific evidence. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. In the book of evidence, peter achinstein argues against the longstanding claim that evidence is ambiguous in possessing a sense of confirming evidence and a sense of supporting evidence. In this, the first book devoted to peter achinstein s influential work in philosophy of science, twenty distinguished philosophers, including four lakatos award winners, address various aspects of achinstein s influential views on the nature of scientific evidence, scientific explanation, and. The book of evidence philosophy johns hopkins university. Perhaps, some of the confusion is because in the book of evidence achinstein uses both conceptual and historical arguments. Peter achinstein specializes in philosophy of science and has interests in the history of science as well. The concept of evidence oxford readings in philosophy 1st ed.
The first is that for something e to be evidence for a hypothesis h, it must be the case that the probability of h given e should be higher than 12. A volume of his important collected essays over the years, evidence, explanation, and realism, was published in the spring of 2010. What is meant by scientific evidence, and how can a definition of this concept be applied in the sciences to determine whether observed facts constitute evidence that a given theory is true. The book of evidence oxford studies in philosophy of. The book of evidence by peter achinstein goodreads. Welcome,you are looking at books for reading, the the book of evidence, you will able to read or download in pdf or epub books and notice some of author may have lock the live reading for some of country. The book of evidence is ambitious in aim and thorough in detail. Peter achinstein has gathered some prominent philosophers and historians of science for critical and lively discussions of both general questions about the meaning of evidence and specific ones about evidence for particular scientific theories. Peter achinstein philosophy johns hopkins university. Peter achinstein is an american philosopher of science.
Peter jacob achinstein born june 30, 1935, american. His latest work, evidence and method, which discusses the scientific methods of isaac newton and james clerk maxwell, will be published in 20. Achinstein portrays his account of evidence as a response to what he calls the deans challenge. To avoid this kind of problem, achinstein adds as a necessary condition to his definition that there be an explanatory connection between the putative evidence and the hypothesisor rather, for potential evidence, it has to be probable that there is such a connection. Induction and severe testing chapter 5 error and inference. In this book, peter achinstein proposes and defends several objective concepts of evidence. Buy the book of evidence oxford studies in philosophy of science by achinstein, peter isbn.
He then explores the question of whether a scientific method, such as that represented in the four rules for. Although i have offered some criticisms of her views on evidence and testing achinstein, 2001, pp. A volume of his important collected essays over the years, evidence, explanation, and realism, was published in the. Apr 11, 20 in this book, peter achinstein proposes and defends several objective concepts of evidence. Oct 16, 2011 to avoid this kind of problem, achinstein adds as a necessary condition to his definition that there be an explanatory connection between the putative evidence and the hypothesisor rather, for potential evidence, it has to be probable that there is such a connection. In 2011, he was honored by a festschrift, philosophy of science matters. As the premier book in the fabulous new series oxford studies in philosophy of science, this volume is essential for philosophers of science and historians of science, as well as for statisticians, scientists with philosophical interests, and anyone curious about scientific reasoning. As she herself notes in the course of showing how misguided my criticism is, we actually agree on two important points. The resulting theory is then applied to philosophical and historical issues.
Peter achinstein interesting stories about famous people. To those more familiar with his approach, there is no surprise. Restoring ambiguity to achinsteins account of evidence the. This contains 20 papers on his work by former students and other important writers. The book of evidence oxford studies in philosophy of science 9780195171716. In this, the first book devoted to peter achinsteins influential work in philosophy of science, twenty distinguished philosophers, including four lakatos award winners, address various aspects of achinsteins influential views on the nature of scientific evidence, scientific explanation, and. Achinstein and the evidence for evolution oxford scholarship.
If it available for your country it will shown as book reader and user fully subscribe will benefit by having. In this fascinating, elegantly written work, distinguished philosopher of science peter achinstein. In 2001, achinstein published the book of evidence, a philosophical and historical study of. Conceptually, he argues against weak notions of evidence which require only that e increases the probability of h, arguing. The book of evidence peter achinstein oxford university press. Peter achinstein books list of books by author peter. Peter achinstein published on june, 2010 the concept of evidence oxford readings in philosophy by peter achinstein 19840112 the nature of explanation by peter achinstein 19851031. Why philosophical theories of evidence are and ought to be ignored by scientists.
Since his book concepts in science, achinstein has adopted. He argues that explications of supporting evidence will necessarily violate his contentions that evidence is a discontinuous threshold concept. Peter achinstein began his book of evidence with the claim that standard philosophical theories of evidence are and ought to be ignored by scientists. In this fascinating, elegantly written work, distinguished philosopher of science. The latter, which received the lakatos award, is a study of methodological problems. In this fascinating, elegantly written work, distinguished philosopher of science peter achinstein explores this question, rejecting. In this, the first book devoted to peter achinstein s influential work in philosophy of science, twenty distinguished philosophers, including four lakatos award winners, address various aspects of achinstein s influential views on the nature of scientific evidence, scientific explanation, and scientific realism. What does it mean to say that a scientist or a theory explains a phenomenon. He argues that explications of supporting evidence will necessarily violate his contentions that evidence is a discontinuous threshold concept and that any philosophical account of. The challenge is to say whether and how philosophy of science offers anything that is relevant to scientists. In this fascinating, elegantly written work, distinguished philosopher of science peter achinstein explores this question, rejecting typical philosophical and statistical theories of evidence.
Thinking about achinsteins philosophy of science rhodes college. Subjective bayesianism is the current orthodoxy in confirmation theory. The first part of the book consists of five chapters which deal with philosophical problems surrounding the notion of evidence. He defines the last three by reference to the first, and then characterizes potential evidence using a new objective epistemic interpretation of probability. Peter achinstein what is required for something to be evidence for an hypothesis. Dec 03, 2018 in this book, peter achinstein proposes and defends several objective concepts of evidence. In 2001, achinstein published the book of evidence, a philosophical and historical study of various concepts of evidence employed in the sciences. In this text, peter achinstein, introduces here a basic concept of potential evidence which is characterised using a novel epistemic. The problem is that, because his account of speculation is defined partly in terms of evidence, achinstein finds himself needing to appeal to philosophical conceptions of. Restoring ambiguity to achinsteins account of evidence. What is required for something to be evidence for a hypothesis. See all books authored by peter achinstein, including concepts of science.
Achinstein characterizes the act of speculating as the introduction of assumptions or hypotheses in ones theorizing without knowing there is evidence for those assumptions or hypotheses p. Jun 01, 2005 peter achinstein has gathered some prominent philosophers and historians of science for critical and lively discussions of both general questions about the meaning of evidence and specific ones about evidence for particular scientific theories. He then explores the question of whether a scientific method, such as that represented in the four rules for the study of natural philosophy that isaac newton invoked in proving his law of gravity, can be employed in demonstrating how the proposed. The book of evidence oxford studies in philosophy of science. Nov 14, 2014 in 2011, he was honored by a festschrift, philosophy of science matters. Achinstein introduces four concepts of evidence, defines three of them by reference to potential evidence, and characterizes the latter using a novel epistemic interpretation of probability. Historical essays in the philosophy of science, and more on.
1297 197 1528 1255 1120 306 1252 956 706 241 640 877 453 787 546 1100 1525 576 108 855 1076 1172 1544 654 1136 735 1145 511 304 1082 316 288